![]() ![]() Maybe it will take off in the future, but today you probably wouldn't choose a Windows-on-ARM PC if you needed top performance. The best you could do with "bootcamp" on Apple Silicon would be to run Windows for ARM - a minority operating system that is struggling to take off amongst PC users, only runs on a couple of tablets/2-in-one PCs and which still relies on Microsoft's equivalent of Rosetta for most software. ![]() having to inflexibly partition your hard drive, re-boot to switch OSs, find some way of accessing HFS on Windows and/or NTFS on Mac.) so you had to be running something that really needed the extra performance to justify BootCamp. Apple probably only did BootCamp on Intel because it was "low hanging fruit" and stopped people bricking their Macs by trying to use the "open-source" method that had already been achieved.Įven on Intel, it was pretty marginal: If you just had a couple of Windows apps that you needed from time to time then virtualization was always a far more convenient solution (vs. ![]() It's just not clear that there's a business case for doing it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |